most of ''Indians '' (east African Asians as referred by Africans) are convinced and preoccupied of their racial purity and cultural activity to such an extent that they don't let their daughters and sisters to marry outside their community.just about anywhere in the world their exist a sizable Indian community who still remains so resistant to the notion of '' diluting their gene pool'' and end up marrying their daughters and sisters to their own community .

Take the case of Uganda,speak to any Ugandan today and there is honest bewildering the 18OO- strong Indian community still remains so reluctant the idea of allowing their daughters to marry ''darkies''.PATRIC a young black Ugandan spoke: before (pre 1972) the Asians used to treat us so badly we could not understand why.now they r well behaved but they still do not let us marry their their daughter. a black man can marry a white man--English,American,Canadian or any other--but never an Indian.

not only this,Indian Resistance to ''marrying out'' is hardly different in Britain,proud home and hearth of 1.3 million Indians,otherwise known as ''paragon immigrants''.Britain's Asian community,of course,in-clude Pakistani,Bangladeshi ,srilankan descent but because Indians accounts for more than half,it may be reasonable to hold them responsible for this racial group's more obvious peculiarities

ironically,Indian community has continued to live in a world of their own and if they are criticized all over world for being so reluctant to different gene pool only they r responsible for such criticization because they have entrapped them self in self made image of their own

it's very intriguing to hear every indian saying they r being prejudiced everywhere but actually they are getting the taste of their own medicine ,i.e.,it is the consequence of culturally walling themselves off.they can come out of this complex only by widening their gene pool by''' marrying out'' their people.